Saltar para o conteúdo
Se não funciona, não pagas. 30 dias.
Implementa.

AI Operations · Role

AI Reliability Engineer (LLMOps)

The AI Reliability Engineer (LLMOps) keeps AI systems standing: they monitor, control cost and latency, and respond when an agent fails or drifts. The SRE of the AI layer.

What they do

  • Instrument agent observability: cost, latency, errors and quality.
  • Define alerts, fallbacks and per-agent spend limits.
  • Diagnose production incidents and prevent regressions.

Skills it needs

Observability and monitoringLLM cost and latency managementOn-call and incident responseGuardrails and safety limitsInfrastructure and deployment

Salary by country and seniority

CountrySeniorityP25MedianP75
GermanyAll€73 000€73 000€73 000Estimativa de fontes públicas
SpainAll€70 000€70 000€70 000Estimativa de fontes públicas
FranceAll€61 225€75 300€80 350Estimativa de fontes públicas
ItalyAll€46 033€46 033€46 033Estimativa de fontes públicas
United StatesMid€114 927€114 927€114 927Estimativa de fontes públicas
United StatesSenior€142 042€142 042€142 042Estimativa de fontes públicas
United StatesAll€142 042€142 042€142 042Estimativa de fontes públicas

Figures in euros, gross annual — each with its source.

Calculate a salary

Also known as

The market uses several titles for the same role:

AI Observability EngineerAIOps EngineerML Reliability EngineerAI SRE

How it changes by seniority

  • Junior Instruments logs and dashboards and handles alerts by runbook.
  • Mid Defines alerts, fallbacks and per-agent spend limits; diagnoses incidents.
  • Senior Owns the agent fleet’s reliability and prevents regressions at scale.

When to hire

When you have several agents in production and their cost or reliability is slipping.

When not to

If you still have a single pilot with no real traffic: nothing to make reliable yet.

Interview questions

  1. 1. A production agent degrades in quality without anyone touching the code. How do you diagnose it?

    What to look for: Thinks drift (provider model, input data), not just bugs; uses observability.

  2. 2. What do you instrument in an LLM system to operate it with confidence?

    What to look for: Traces inputs/steps/cost/latency and alerts on the abnormal; dashboards for the owner, not just logs.

  3. 3. The provider is retiring the model you use. What’s your plan?

    What to look for: Re-runs evals with the new model, versions and prepares rollback; doesn’t trust "it’ll behave the same".

  4. 4. How do you set SLAs on something probabilistic like an LLM?

    What to look for: Defines targets by accuracy/latency/cost and escalates to a human when they slip.

Scorecard

  • Drift detectionSeparates code failure from a changing world; catches degradation in time.
  • LLM observabilityInstruments inputs, steps, cost and latency; useful alerting, not noise.
  • Model-change managementVersions, re-evaluates and prepares rollback for provider deprecations.
  • Operable reliabilityDefines measurable targets and escalation paths for something probabilistic.

Red flags

  • Only logs the final output: when it fails, there’s no way to know why.
  • Switches models without re-running the evals.
  • Alerts on everything until nobody heeds the alerts.

Hiring or assessing this profile?

Generate the full interview script and scorecard, tailored to the seniority you’re hiring for.

Open the interview scorecard