The 4 inputs the prompt needs (without them it doesn't work)
Without all four inputs together, the prompt produces dressed-up templates. Missing even one is the difference between a 0% and a 4% reply rate:
- Product context. What you sell, who you sell to, concrete value proposition (not "we help companies grow").
- Real prospect profile. Title, company, industry, size, recent signals (funding, hiring, press mention).
- Specific campaign angle. Not "introduce the company", but "why this specific prospect right now".
- Tone and format. Language, register, max length, exact CTA.
Tested prompt templates
Structure that works in US B2B mid-market:
- System prompt: role, brand, value prop, tone, length (60-100 words), format (specific CTA).
- User prompt: prospect data (name, title, company, industry, recent signal) + concrete angle + example of the desired CTA.
- Post-validation: detect and strip clichés, ensure mention of at least 2 specific data points.
How to connect ChatGPT to the prospect's public data
- Manual (low volume). Copy LinkedIn + press section of the site + latest relevant post → into the prompt.
- Semi-automated (Make/Zapier + Clay). Clay enriches + Make passes to ChatGPT + returns a ready-to-send email.
- Fully automated (custom). Pipeline with legitimate scraping + LLM + send via Instantly/Smartlead.
When to jump to a real AI SDR
Using ChatGPT for prospecting is phase 0 — useful for low volume and for learning. When you outgrow it:
- Volume >150 emails/week.
- Need to manage deliverability and warm-up.
- Reporting of pipeline generated vs. emails sent.
- Bidirectional CRM integration.
- Systematic A/B testing of copy and segments.
Measure replies, not opens
Open rates have become unreliable thanks to privacy protections. The honest metrics for outbound:
| Metric | Reasonable B2B read |
|---|---|
| Positive reply rate | 1-3% cold, 5-12% well segmented |
| Meetings booked | Depends on volume; ratio of meetings/sends |
| Qualified pipeline generated | The final metric |
| Bounce rate | <2% healthy |
| Spam complaints | <0.1% |